You can download the supervisor pack here

This session introduces the learning process and is an opportunity for you as a supervisor to present learning opportunities to the supervisee.  This may create a space to collaborate with the supervisee and negotiate a learning programme that suits both parties.

This session divides the clinical reasoning process into normative and narrative aspects of clinical decision making to facilitate two differing perspectives that can influence the clinical reasoning process.  There may be tensions between these areas and at the same time an ever changing and evolving context that needs to be considered when taking the next step.

This session describes aspects of the history of clinical reasoning in healthcare from an agent-host model through to the bio-psychosocial and biocultural models. Not only has clinical reasoning had to evolve with a greater understanding and development of the natural sciences it has also had to respond to, and acknowledge, the societal and cultural changes that have unfolded alongside it. This is particularly relevant when considering the current challenges of longer-term conditions and associated co-morbidities.

This session describes some of the many models of clinical reasoning that are used in practice including a shift toward personalised care that acknowledge the co-constructed and shared understanding of the human predicament.

This session uses a case study of a person with back pain to explore the analytical, emotive and intuitive aspects of clinical reasoning. This highlights how clinical reasoning is not simply a matter of adding things up and considering the weight of the presenting evidence, it also includes aspects of gut feeling and emotions drawn from previous experiences, current events, and anticipations of the future.

This session recognises different forms of clinical reasoning and the various approaches that are applied from different professional perspectives. It attempts to provide a consolidated model taking into account the clinical reasoning theories, strategies and frameworks that are centred around the person that we are caring for.

This session describes and contrasts two distinct, but related accounts of how evidence in clinical practice should be considered and evaluated. This starts with evidence-based medicine as the starting point in the early 1990’s through to a modern version of evidence-based medicine or healthcare. The concept of clinical mindlines is introduced and discussed with the aim of encouraging the participant of this session to reflect upon the nature of knowledge and how it is used in clinical practice.

Clinicians will often have to judge many different, and often contentious, forms of information in order to reach a decision. The nature of this information does not exist in a vacuum and will come from a particular perspective. This is where philosophy can shed light on the implicit and taken for granted assumptions that we all have when using evidence in order to make clinical decisions. It is hoped that this session will provide a platform for clinicians to consider this and allow a space for future reflective practice.

All clinical decisions require an ethical standpoint. This session explores and describes different ethical perspectives spanning general ethical considerations to particular cases. It is hoped that this session will draw the attention of clinicians to this important area of healthcare practice.